Mouse 49½

For some years now, I have been displaying the latest score in the Rodent Wars in the sidebar on the Gruts home page [removed since this post was written]. I use the plural because the wars are seasonal, with Open Season beginning, as these things tend to, on the Glorious Twelfth. The new season has already seen a lot of action, with good old homo sapiens continuing to hold the upper hand.

The wars began on Sunday, 13th October, 2002 (rather appropriately, Margaret Thatcher’s 77th birthday). I recorded the great event for posterity a couple of days later in a letter to Stense:

This Sunday, Jen was rooting round in a food cupboard and uncovered clear evidence that we had a mouse. Half a (very large) bar of Milky Bar chocolate had been demolished. Ordinarily, I’d have let bygones be bygones, but I’m particularly partial to Milky Bar, so this meant war…

I then remembered that I’d seen a Little Nipper mousetrap behind the kickboards in the kitchen, so I dug it out and loaded it up with Milky Bar. The following morning, the chocolate had gone, but the trap remained unsprung. Clearly, I was dealing with a wily rodent here. So last night we tried a new strategy, viz. Toblerone. Ten minutes after we’d retired to bed last night, I heard the trap snap shut…

Since then, it has been all-out (albeit seasonal) warfare. As the above quote demonstrates, in the early days, the campaign was fairly evenly matched: sometimes the mice escaped (one point to the furry fiends), sometimes the mouse was caught (one point to the human beings). But, as we have became more battle-hardened, Jen and I have become much better at setting our trap: it has been over two years since the mice scored a single point against us. But still they come.

Yesterday morning, the Rodent Wars reached a major milestone: mouse 49½.

The ½ is a particular sore point with Jen, who believes she earned the full point. I explained how the half point arose in another letter to Stense written a month later:

I told you about the mice, didn’t I? We trapped two a couple of weeks back, then didn’t catch any more, so we thought we’d got rid of them. Then we noticed fresh droppings (or spoor as we big game hunters tend to think of the stuff). So we set the trap again and caught another mouse last Saturday night. We set the trap again on Sunday night and, on Monday morning, we came down to the kitchen to find the empty mouse trap sitting in the middle of the kitchen floor, six feet from where we’d left it. No sign of any mouse. No sign, that is, until Jen picks up her work bag in the hall and sees something moving inside… She puts the bag on the kitchen work top and steps back, and this mouse climbs out of the bag and sits on top of it looking at us kind of sleepily. So Jen grabs an empty pint glass and a magazine and catches the cheeky little bugger! She then releases it into the adjacent field, singing the theme song from Born Free. I think we’ll call that one a draw.

What do you think? Should catching a mouse with a glass and magazine, as if it were nothing more than a wasp, have earned Jen the full point? Or, should the mouse have got the point for avoiding the trap and coming out of the ordeal alive? Or was I right to call it a draw?

(I made up the Born Free bit, by the way.)

See also: Dispatches from the Rodent Wars

Here’s looking at Euclid

Ever since I first encountered it at school, I’ve always admired the elegant simplicity of the reductio ad absurdum proof of the irrationality of the square-root of two. I know, I know: I really should get out more.

This week’s New Scientist includes a description of Euclid‘s equally elegant and simple, 2,300-year-old, reductio ad absurdum proof that there is an infinite number of prime numbers. I hadn’t seen it before. It’s really neat. The description goes as follows:

Suppose a mathematician comes with a finite list of primes and claims there are no more. Euclid showed that there must be a prime missing from the list. Multiply all the primes on the list together and then add one to this number. This new number is not divisible by any of the primes on the list because you always get remainder one. So Euclid’s new number is either another prime itself or divisible by a prime that is missing from the list. If you add this new prime to the list, repeating Euclid’s trick will always show that any finite list is missing a prime.

Sorry to bore you with maths. The real reason I’m doing it is because I just thought of the here’s looking at Euclid pun, and I really didn’t want to let it to go to waste.

Papal bull

If this turns out to be true (and, from the vibes I’ve been picking up lately, it almost certainly will), then I take back everything nice I’ve ever said about the Pope:

Guardian: Pope prepares to embrace theory of intelligent design

Philosophers, scientists and other intellectuals close to Pope Benedict will gather at his summer palace outside Rome this week for intensive discussions that could herald a fundamental shift in the Vatican’s view of evolution.

There have been growing signs the Pope is considering aligning his church more closely with the theory of “intelligent design” taught in some US states. Advocates of the theory argue that some features of the universe and nature are so complex that they must have been designed by a higher intelligence. Critics say it is a disguise for creationism.

Oh, that’s right, I have never said anything nice about the Pope.

Right, wasn’t I?

Of course, you realise this means war.

Rubbish

BBC: ‘Pay as you throw’ call for waste

Councils should be given powers to charge households for getting rid of non-recyclable rubbish, a think tank has urged the government.

The Institute for Public Policy Research said a “pay as you throw” system was the only way to improve the UK’s poor recycling record.

Erm… aren’t we being charged already? It’s called the Council Tax, chaps.

Who are these tossers in so-called think tanks do you reckon? I’ll bet they’re self-appointed (as well as self-important). Their answer to every problem seems to be to fine people. I think we should fine think tanks every time they come up with a solution that involves taking more money off us.

It is simply not true that the only way to improve the UK’s poor recycling record is to charge for non-recyclable rubbish. For a start, why not give people better recycling facilities? I wrote to my own council recently to complain about ours: we receive a single, tiny recycling box which is collected once per fortnight, we are not allowed to over-fill the box, we are expected to wash anything that is dirty, and we are expected to bag-up the different types of rubbish before we put it in the box. It’s ridiculous. I don’t mind separating stuff (which is where I can add real value to the recycling process), but why all this other palaver? What we need is different bins for different types of rubbish—like they do in other places. But Calderdale Council (to name and shame it), despite our frankly massive council tax, apparently hasn’t got the money to do recycling properly because it has spent it all on unnecessary and highly criticised road improvements in Hebden Bridge.

I mean, Hebden Bridge is Hippy Central, for Pete’s sake: this should be like pushing at an open door. If we can’t get recycling right here, we really are knackered.

Paradigm shift

A cavewoman

A cavewoman 1,002,006 years ago.

For reasons I won’t go into, I was thinking about cavemen the other day—or, rather, cavewomen.

The thought occurred to me, wouldn’t it be really cool if palaeontologists dug up a new cavewoman fossil somewhere, and, when they made a reconstruction of what she must have looked like, she turned out to be the spitting image of Raquel Welch? The discovery would rock the palaeoanthropological world to its very foundations.

It would also require us to revise our views on the historical accuracy of Hammer films.

Falsification forcing a major theoretical rethink: that’s what good science is all about.

See also: Australopittecus

Cross those off the shopping list

Observer: So, just how unethical is your supper?

Pink lady apples: A hybrid of Golden Delicious and Lady Williams, the UK’s fastest-growing apple variety is colonising our shelves. But it sets a sinister precedent—the first trademarked or patented apple. So although it has been created using material from the natural world’s genetic ‘commonwealth’, the hybrid is now the property of a profit-driven company. Anyone wanting to plant Pink Lady has to pay for the privilege of growing it. Critics say this is ‘bio-piracy’, the privatisation of our planet’s biodiversity.

‘Six easy points’, my arse!

I see Liverpool have made their usual flying start to the new season with a 1-1 draw against newly promoted Sheffield United.

I have a theory (which is easily checked, but I’m not about to in case it turns out to be wrong) that, if Liverpool could average the same number of points in the first quarter of each season as they do in the remaining three-quarters, they would win the championship pretty much every year. They always seem to play totally crap at the start of the season, then spend the rest of it playing catch-up.

They also seem to be a lot better at taking points off the good teams than off the crap ones.

What’s particularly irksome about yesterday’s result is that I was genuinely delighted when the Blades were promoted last season, and I hope they do well (i.e. avoid relegation) this one.

But not by taking points off Liverpool.

Bloody hell, Jen‘s kid brother (a fanatical Blades fan) is going to be unsufferable the next time we go out for a few pints!

Distortion

A completely fabricated news story, courtesy of the Beeb:

BBC: U-571 writer regrets ‘distortion’

Screenwriter David Ayer has admitted his 2000 film U-571 distorted history and that he would not do it again.

No he hasn’t.

I heard the full interview with Ayer on the radio this afternoon. At the end of the interview, he was challenged about the historical accuracy of his historically inaccurate film, U-571. He pointed out that it was a work of fiction, which required Americans to be the heroes for it to stand any chance at all at the box office. He gave due respect to the real-life (British) heroes who rescued a German Enigma cypher machine from a sinking U-boat in 1941. Then, when pressed, pathetically, for an abject apology, he, rather engagingly, joked (as quoted at the very end of the aforequoted item), “I won’t do it again”.

In other words, Ayer didn’t, as implied above, say that, given the chance, he wouldn’t do it again; he simply promised not to do it again in future. The joke being that he would never need to.

So the BBC has blown up a droll joke into a totally misleading non-news story.

Kind of ironic, bearing in mind the BBC was accusing Ayer of distorting the facts.

See also:

Crouching Tiger, Lucky Spaniel

The other night, I dreamt I was taking my childhood dog for a walk on the moors above my house. I had just let her off the lead, when I spotted a tiger crouching in the long grass behind a dry stone wall. The tiger was clearly about to attack the unsuspecting spaniel.

Without any thought for my own safety, I ran up to the wall and began hurling stones from it at the tiger. The tiger snarled and growled for a while, but eventually ran off.

In my dreams, I’m one badass mother who don’t take no shit from tigers.

Feeling a right tit

BBC: Baggage advice for UK passengers

… No liquids of any type are permitted through the airport security search point, other than the following items:
  • Prescription medicines in liquid form sufficient and essential for the flight (eg diabetic kit), as long as verified as authentic.
  • Baby milk and liquid baby food (the contents of each bottle or jar must be tasted by the accompanying passenger).
The definition of liquids includes:
  • Gels, pastes, lotions, liquid/solid mixtures.
  • The contents of pressurised containers, eg toothpaste, hair gel, drinks, soups, syrups, perfume, deodorant, shaving foam, aerosols etc.

I wonder if the authorities have started frisking for silicone implants yet.

Nice work if you can get it.

Who’s this tosser?

Guardian Weekend: Letters

I was inspired by Matthew Fort to forgo my shopping and instead root through cupboard and fridge for “hidden treasures” (Recipes, August 5). Imagine my dismay on finding myself clean out of chard, pecorino and duck eggs. Some swine must have also polished off the left-over rabbit stew together with the gooseberry and elderflower purée. Damn. Does Matthew Fort have any creative uses for sardines, Ryvita and frozen peas?
Nigel Longhurst
Speke, Liverpool

Ever felt you’ve been had?

BBC: Wind farm at one third capacity

One of the UK’s biggest offshore wind farms is producing less than one third of the electricity it should be, according to a new report.

The 30-turbine Scroby Sands wind farm built off the coast of Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, has generated 28.9% of the power it was built to provide.

It’s worse than that: according to the official report (493K PDF), the wind powerstation’s performance during the second half of the twelve-month study (allowing a little time for wear and tear to set in) dropped to less than 25%.

Anyone might think they had sexed-up their original projections in order to get planning permission (and lots of lovely green subsidies).

Open prisons

Everyone should have a few harmless hobbies. As well as taking a keen and highly knowledgeable interest in horses, strangling the occasional peasant, and waving at bemused fat blokes, Her Majesty the Queen takes great delight in opening major public buildings. You name them, she’s opened them: libraries, schools, courts, hospitals, railway stations. So keen, in fact, is the Queen on declaring buildings open that they often let her do it retrospectively, long after the buildings have become fully operational.

But it has just occurred to me that I’ve never heard of Her Majesty opening a prison. Which is pretty odd, as they all seem to be named after her.

Can you just imagine the Queen declaring a prison open and then having to walk down a line of specially selected, well-behaved inmates, making polite conversation with them?

“Hello. What did you do?” I hope she would say.

Erratum: For peasant read pheasant throughout (with a tip of the hat to Sellars and Yeatman).

 

New Labour

I had a great idea for a new reality TV show today: Big Mother… Fifteen heavily pregnant women locked up in a house together. Contestants are evicted the moment their waters break. The winner is the woman who holds it in the longest.

Then I thought to myself, that’s such a ridiculous idea, it must have been done already. It turns out I was right (more or less).

Well, it would be better than Love Island, at any rate.