Pretentious? Nous?

You’ll never guess what I saw in Tesco, Prestwich, last Thursday—right next to the HP Sauce. Go on, have a guess.

No, that’s not it.

No, that’s not it either.

Pickled quails’ eggs. I kid you not. In Tesco. Who do they think they are?

Come to think of it, what sort of person actually wants to buy pickled quails’ eggs in the first place? Have you ever seen a quail’s egg? They’re not exactly filling. I reckon I could get one in my nostril at a push. And, even if this mythical customer was in the market for a few pickled quails’ eggs, can you imagine them saying to themself, “I wonder if they’ll have any at Tesco.”

Hardly bloody likely, is it?

(Unless they read this, of course.)

I’ll get my coat

BBC: Euro jackpot lost in player error

Members of a Belgian lottery syndicate who thought they had won 27m euros were dealt a huge blow when they found their winning numbers had not been entered…

[T]he group of friends were crushed when it turned out the person charged with buying the ticket had allowed the machine to choose random numbers.

This is exactly the reason why, in my two-person lottery syndicate with Carolyn, I insist on choosing random numbers each week. Carolyn, however, believes in the Gambler’s Fallacy, so, in her two-person lottery syndicate with me, she always chooses the same numbers.

To date, my randomly chosen numbers have won us fifty quid, whereas Carolyn’s lucky numbers have won exactly zero sausages.

Not that that proves anything.

Cheese and wine

I’d just poured myself a glass of wine on Thursday night, when Carolyn sent me an instant message asking for some computer assistance. I didn’t really understand what she was on about, so I rang her. It turned out she was about to pour herself a glass of wine too, so we had a virtual drink together. It’s the best we seem to be able to manage these days.

The following conversation took place:

R: Which wine are you drinking?
C: It’s a posh one with lots of gold thread round the bottle: Marques de Valido… REE-ODJA.
R: REE-OCKA, it’s pronounced REE-OCKA.
C: No, that’s a type of cheese!
R: No, that’s ricotta.
[Howls of laughter on both our parts.]
C: It’s very good: nineteen ninety-nine.
R: Bloody hell! It should be… Oh, you don’t mean the price, do you? You mean the year.
[More howls of laughter.]
C: You were really impressed for a moment, then, weren’t you?

Of course, Carolyn wasn’t quite sure whether to believe me about Rioja being a wine and not a cheese, so she took the precaution of checking with her dad the following morning. He said he was fairly sure it was a wine.

Mannerisms of the glabrous

Don’t bald men seem to spend an awful lot of time rubbing their heads? They want to get over it. I’m fat, but I don’t spend all day rubbing my stomach.

But perhaps I’ve got it the wrong way round. Perhaps rubbing their heads all day is what made them go bald in the first place.

Someone should do a study.

Weirdo

I nearly forgot all about this one. Last Friday, Jen and I did a spot of Christmas shopping in Manchester. While we were in Marks and Sparks, I took the opportunity to powder my nose. As I walked into the gents, a scruffy-looking man followed me in carrying a huge pair of branch-loppers. This was rather off-putting.

On his way out, rather than using the door handle like any normal person, the scruffy-looking man opened the door by reaching up and pulling on the mechanical door-closer. He did it on both sets of doors. I thought this was pretty odd, so I gave him a few seconds before I followed him out.

Thinking about it afterwards, I’ve come up with four possible explanations for his strange door-opening technique:

  • he had a toilet-door-handle phobia
  • he was a fugitive from the law and didn’t want to leave any prints
  • he was drunk
  • he was nuts

Any other suggestions?

End of an era

Moleskine

Moleskine numero uno

Ever since I was a little kid and read Bobby Brewster, Detective, I’ve been a compulsive notebook collector. Not that I ever wrote anything in them, you understand—they were far too nice to spoil with my scrawl.

Then, a few years back, my poor old Psion Organiser finally went west, and I was suddenly without something to note down amusing stuff that might eventually make it into one of my letters to Stense, or something like that. So I finally cracked open one of my many unused Moleskine™ notebooks and started jotting stuff down.

Much of the crap that has appeared on Gruts over the last few years appeared in first draft in that notebook. It has been pretty much my constant companion since 15th December, 2003.

Last week came the end of an era: I finally filled my Moleskine. It was kind of sad. Over the years, in addition to covering its pages with my untidy (and often drunken) handwriting, I had padded it out by sticking in stuff which happened to come to hand. It became a sort of scrapbook. Stuck amongst the pages, you will find collections of fruit stickers, train tickets, idle doodles made on loose pieces of paper, and the occasional raffle ticket.

Pensive bird

Here, for example is a pensive bird I doodled on 17th May this year. It’s some sort of finch, by the look of it. When I showed it to Stense during one of our hot dates, she suddenly went all dewy-eyed and girlie on me, saying it was gorgeous, and wasn’t I a talented artist? I didn’t like to tell her it started off life as a doodle of a parrot which went horribly wrong.

So, anyway, it turns out that my Moleskine is packed full of rather a lot of sentimental rubbish and fond memories. Which is why it was kind of sad to finish it.

I’ve started a new one, of course, but I haven’t really broken it in yet: its pages are far too pristine and, well, white. But I’m sure I’ll soon knock it out of shape.

Bungled Banksy heist

BBC: Gang foiled over Banksy theft bid

A gang of thieves disguised as workmen tried to cash in on the popularity of guerilla artist Banksy—by trying to steal the door of a derelict building.

The Bristol-based artist had daubed a painting on the steel door in Slater Street, Liverpool, as part of the city’s biennial in 2004.

The gang attempted to steal it but they were scared off by cleaners…

The work on the door, known as Liverpool Love Rat, has not been valued but is now under lock and key.

They would have gotten away with it, if it weren’t for those pesky cleaners.

Fortunately, for those of you who might have missed it, I was prescient enough to capture the work of art in situ for posterity:

'Liverpool Love Rat' by Banksy

Liverpool Love Rat.

Ah, yes, but is it really art?

See also:

Burka’s peerage

I don’t know if it’s some sort of reaction to Jack Straw’s recent comments about Moslem veils, but there certainly seem to be a lot more women wearing burkas in Liverpool in recent months.

Well, I assume they’re women.

On Tuesday, someone wearing a black burka with an extremely thin eye-slit walked past me carrying a cup of Starbucks™ coffee. I then proceeded to spend far more time than was sensible wondering how a person wearing a burka manages to drink coffee in public without revealing their face. As I thought about the problem in depth, I found myself conjuring up various contraptions involving drinking straws’ passing through eye-slits.

I think I might have spotted a gap in the market—and a market in the gap.

Postscript: Actually, having now consulted this useful BBC graphic, I think the person was wearing was a niqab, not a burka. The title of this item stands, however, as I’m rather proud of the pun (eye-slits, peerage, geddit?).

The Dead Cat

I’ve been putting this one off all week, because I know I won’t be able to do it justice. It’s one of those stories where you really had to be there, but I’ve got to try to make some sort of record of it for posterity—if for no other reason than it involves a dead cat.

I spoke with Carolyn on the phone on Monday, and she told me a story which made me laugh so hard that I couldn’t breathe, started to go light-headed, and was seeing dots in front of my eyes. I honestly thought I was going to be sick—which would have been pretty embarrassing, as I was at work at the time.

The problem I have repeating Carolyn’s story is the very Carolynish way in which she told it: she started in the middle with what sounded like the punch-line, then went back to the beginning, jumped forward and back a bit, then went off on a complete tangent to an entirely different story that was just as funny, then she returned to the first story to flesh out some more details she had just remembered, and so on. It was all over the place, basically—which is hardly surprising, because it started off as a throwaway comment, which I insisted she explain.

Carolyn has previously accused me of embellishing one or two of my stories about her (which, for the record, I honestly don’t think I did), but this time I’m going to admit it up front: I simply can’t tell this story as Carolyn told it to me because, like I said, it was all over the place. So I’m going to have to use some artistic licence and write it as a monologue, rather than a two-way phone conversation—as if Carolyn were writing it. And I’m going to have to rearrange the story so that it is told in some sort of logical order. I might get one or two of the details slightly wrong, but I’ll try to keep to the general spirit of what Carolyn said. [Carolyn has now commented on my version of the story and I have corrected some minor errors.] So here goes:

Did I tell you about the old woman who turned up at my door with a dead cat last Saturday? Well, actually, no she didn’t: she turned up without a dead cat. I answered the door and she just stared at me anxiously, not saying anything.

“Can I help you,” I asked. She looked down at the children, then looked back at me and mouthed, “Can I have a word?”

So I sent the children off to play, and the woman asked me to follow her up the drive. As we were walking, she asked me if I owned a long-haired, black and white cat. Oh good grief, I thought, what’s he been up to now? Don’t say he’s been making lots of kittens! I bet she wants me to take a whole pile of kittens off her hands!

“Well, no, he’s not really ours,” I explained, in a bit of a panic; “he’s a stray really. He just comes to the house and we sort of feed him. He’s not really our cat!

“Well, I’ve got him in the car,” she said. “He looked so beautiful that I couldn’t leave him.”

She didn’t actually say he was dead at first. When I worked out that he was and asked if he’d been in a road accident, she said yes, so I went to get a towel.

Well the cat clearly didn’t look beautiful at all, because he was very clearly dead. We looked at him sadly for a moment, and I wondered what on Earth I was going to tell the children. It was only as the woman had half-lifted the cat out of her car that I realised it didn’t look quite right somehow. I had a closer look, and said, “Actually, I’m not sure if that is our cat. Do you mind if I pop into the house again for a moment to check?” So I popped back into the house, and found our cat fast asleep on the bed!

So I went back to the woman and told her that it wasn’t our cat. She looked slightly disappointed, and said, “Well, I suppose I’d better bury it myself then… I know, I’ll bury it next to the horse I buried the other week!” I thought this was a pretty odd thing to say, but I later worked out she must own a stable or something.

I don’t know what made me say it, but I said, “Well, if anyone asks, I’ll say it’s buried next to a horse”—which is a pretty odd thing to say too, if you think about it. Then, the next thing I knew, this woman was showing me loads of photographs of cats on her mobile phone, as if I liked the things. I don’t like cats: I’m allergic to them!

WHY DO PEOPLE KEEP WALKING DOWN MY DRIVE AND DOING WEIRD THINGS?

Did I tell you about the five-or-so people who were walking their dog in our garden a while ago? I think they thought it was a park or something. We eventually had to go out and ask them what they were doing.

And then there was that time a few weeks ago when a whole pile of people decided to have a picnic in our driveway. They had deck-chairs and everything. I couldn’t get my car out!

(Like I said, you really had to be there.)

Cock v Papal Bull

Guardian: Vatican urged to act quickly on condoms

The World Health Organisation’s head of HIV/Aids called on the Vatican yesterday to speed up a decision on the limited use of condoms in pandemic-hit countries.

I do hope the Vatican finally sees some sense. There’s a first time for everything. It was the previous pope’s irresponsible position on condoms that made me realise that John Paul II was an evil little turd whom they would probably make into a saint one day. (Not that I believe in good and evil, you understand.)

On a lighter note, have you noticed the name of the WHO’s head of HIV/AIDS who is calling for the Vatican to change its stance condoms? He is none other than Kevin De Cock.

You couldn’t make this stuff up. I’ll bet he was teased mercilessly at school.

It lends a whole new meaning to the phrase Thank Kevin for little girls.

Scam

Jen and I bought a few provisions in a local Spar in Edinburgh on Friday. The total came to £5.10. I handed the woman on the till a £10 note, and Jen handed her a 10p piece. The woman handed back a £5 note as change, which Jen pocketed.

“I’m liking the way that went,” said the woman on the till, nodding appreciatively. “I’m liking it a lot.”

I hadn’t a clue what she was talking about.