Giving dogma a bad name

Reuters: Pope says some science shatters human dignity

VATICAN CITY (Reuters) – Pope Benedict said on Thursday that embryonic stem cell research, artificial insemination and the prospect of human cloning had “shattered” human dignity.

The scientists carrying out stem cell research have realistic hopes of finding effective treatments for cancer, Parkinson’s Disease, brain injuries, and many other horrible ailments.

My grandfather spent the last 20 years of his life bedridden with Pakinson’s Disease. It was not dignifying. A very close family member recently underwent major cancer treatment. They found it utterly humiliating. Another close family member has been disabled for many years following a major brain injury. They would give their ineffective left arm for a cure.

Repeat pious bullshit like that in front of me, Ratzinger, and you’ll be making an unplanned trip to Lourdes—on your knees, wearing sackcloth—to beg for the intervention of a figment of your imagination.

I trust you’ll find that commensurate with your human dignity.

Jeremy Beadle dies

or does he? You’re not fooling us, Jezza: this is another one of your hilarious practical jokes!

(Admit it, the thought crossed your mind too.)

Interesting Jeremy Beadle factoid: he organised Captain Beefheart’s first UK tour. No, seriously. So not such an idiot after all, eh?

Weapon of choice

My dad has what can only be described as an unhealthy paranoia about the BBC. He thinks they’re the spawn of Satan.

Like all the best paranoias and conspiracy theories, Dad’s has a small toe-hold in reality. There certainly is a Southern England bias at the BBC, which is reflected in its news coverage and even its weather forecasts. But Dad seems to believe that every single BBC presenter or continuity announcer who pronounces their A’s long was personally selected by the Director General to promote the corporation’s Cockney Agenda.

Dad’s fixation with the BBC began in the summer of 1982 during the Falklands War. Every evening, the Newsnight programme would wheel on some recently retired British general and get him to talk military tactics. Dad was convinced this was tantamount to treason. “The Argentinan Embassy will be noting all this down!” he would shout at Peter Snow.

In fact, Dad did have a point: I clearly remember how, during the early days of the war, when one Argentinian bomb hit a British warship but failed to explode, the BBC displayed a helpful graphic showing how the bomb should have been dropped. Next thing our lads in the South Atlantic knew, that was exactly how the bombs were being dropped—with far greater effect.

Ever since then, Dad has been convinced that the BBC’s not particularly well-hidden agenda is to undermine British society and betray us to our enemies. He is, for example, the only person I know who believes that the Hutton Enquiry wasn’t a shameless stitch-up, totally exhonorated the Blair government, and showed up the BBC and its Cockney Director General for what they really were.

This Tuesday, Dad’s BBC paranoia finally tipped him over the edge. My parents and I were watching the comedy quiz show QI, when Stephen Fry asked a question along the lines of, “Why might it be dangerous to have a ship-load of pistachio nuts?” The answer, it turned out, was that large masses of pistachio nuts are prone to spontaneous combustion and can sometimes explode.

“There they go again!” Dad shouted at the telly. “Giving away information of use to terrorists!”

Mum and I thought we were going to die. We were laughing so much, we couldn’t breath.

“I hardly think the pistachio nut is going to be the weapon of choice for a terrorist!” I gasped at Dad, still trying to work out out how to get my lungs to take in air.

Dad was adamant: “Mark my words, you’ll be watching the news one day soon, saying ‘Norm predicted that!’”

Reprieve

Monty Burns

BBC: Massive wind farm ‘turned down’

Plans to build one of Europe’s biggest wind farms on the Isle of Lewis are set to be turned down, BBC Scotland understands.

The BBC’s Gaelic news service, Radio nan Gaidheal, has learned that Scottish Government ministers are “minded to refuse” the 181 turbine scheme.

More of a temporary reprieve than a permanent stay of environmental and cultural vandalism, I fear, but enough to make me crack open a bottle of my favourite malt to celebrate.

Slainte Mhath!

Happy Burns Night!

Namesakes

For a few brief moments, I thought Hillary Clinton had been assassinated. Turned out they were referring to the late Sir Edmund Hillary. Not that Sir Edmund Hillary was assassinated, you understand. I suppose, if he had been, the headline would have been They Knocked the Bastard Off!

Doesn’t it annoy you how Hillary Clinton is campaigning for the U.S. Democratic nomination under her first name? Anyone might think she is trying to distance herself from her surname.

Which she is.

Fancy pudding

From a late-night online chat with Carolyn during the transition between yesterday and today (slightly abridged for brevity):

Carolyn: We had [friend's name] to tea tonight and so we had to have sausages.
Me: So when are you inviting ME to tea? I’m not a fussy eater! But I do love sausages!
Carolyn: I do a good ham and treacle tart!
Me: Have you ever eaten muffs?
Carolyn: What are they?
Me: You come from Bromborough! You MUST have eaten muffs! They’re fantastic!
Carolyn: Oh yes, I thought it was a fancy pudding!

See also: Muff’s Online (highly recommended)

Monkey tale

I tried to engage a couple of colleagues in a metaphysical discussion last week. Actually, it was more of a metabiological thought experiment:

“Stand still,” I said, “and imagine that you have suddenly sprouted a tail like a monkey’s.”

My colleagues looked at me sceptically.

“No, go on, I’m being serious. Imagine you’ve got a monkey’s tail. Now here’s my question: would you instinctively know how to move it about? Do you think your brain would be capable of sending a message via your nervous system to your new limb to tell it to move? Go on, try it now: try to move your imaginary tail. Can you do it?”

The sceptical looks turned to blank ones.

“Well I can!” I said. “I instinctively know how to move my imaginary tail around. In fact, I’m doing it right now!”

My colleagues told me I was weird.

I think about this sort of thing a lot.

Fieldfare etymology

Fieldfare

A fieldfare last Saturday.

I went for a walk on the moors on Saturday (photos here). It was extremely wet.

On my way down, I spotted between 40 and 50 fieldfares gathered in the gloaming on some powerlines. A couple of other walkers spotted me looking at the birds and came over to ask me what they were. I explained that they were fieldfares. They asked me what I knew about them.

As luck would have it, I had listened to a podcast about fieldfares earlier that week, so I knew quite a bit about them. So I told the walkers about how fieldfares come over from Scandinavia in the winter, how they have a distinctive call (which a few of the birds immediately obliged me by demonstrating), how they hang around with redwings, how they have a distinctive grey hood, blah, blah, blah… My new friends seemed very impressed with my vast knowledge of all things fieldfare.

“So why are they called fieldfares?” asked the woman (who I couldn’t help noticing was rather cute). It was a fair enough question. Unfortunately, I hadn’t a clue what the answer was. But I was on a roll, so I made one up:

Ah!” I ahed. “It’s because they are ‘fare’ (food) which is found in fields. Our ancestors used to eat them. Quite tasty, by all accounts. They’re a type of thrush, just like blackbirds… ‘Four-and-twenty blackbirds baked in a pie’ and all that!”

OK, so I bullshat for Britain. But I had a new-found reputation to live up to.

Carolyn cooks ‘luch’

Carolyn in an online chat yesterday evening:

I cooked luch for my parents today. First I thought I had a 16lb ham (because the man in the recipe did and I assumed that I must too), and then I tried to cook a treacle tart. Easy I thought, I started it last night just to be sure. First, the pastry was runny – so I added more flour and icing sugar, and then it was still very sticky and I mean VERY sticky this morning and so I had to put it in the freezer in cling film before rolling. Then the topping took all morning to make – what a nightmare. Luch was finally served at about 2.30! […]

I took the cooking wrapper off last night to soak the ham as per instructions on Gary Rhodes recipe so that was why I didn’t know what weight it was. It never occurred to me that I wasn’t using the same weight as him – although it’s apparently very obvious to everyone else. So then I thought I had to cook it for about 5 hours – very worrying when I only had 2! That was when I rang my mum to delay luch for ½ hour thinking that I’d just do 2½ hours and hope nobody noticed if it wasn’t cooked!

Stuff came out my nose.