Never thought I'd find myself in total agreement with the Daily Telegraph.
A fart on Thomas Putnam!
Right, I'm off to bludgeon a fox cub.
🦆
Never thought I'd find myself in total agreement with the Daily Telegraph.
A fart on Thomas Putnam!
Right, I'm off to bludgeon a fox cub.
Have you ever considered that if people simply observed the law (like those lovely, law abiding fox hunting
scumpeople) it would not cost the government anything?Seriously though: rather than having diluted smoke to contend with, we will now have to run the gauntlet of concentrated ghettos of puffing billies outside every pub & restaurant!
I'm afraid that's what happens when you set out to ghettoise people.
Well, I suppose I will just have to go ahead & die of lung cancer, like my parents!
If so-called passive smoking were that dangerous, we'd all be dead by now.
Besides, you won't need to get into a pub or restaurant soon: the health puritans, flushed with success, are already setting their sites on the drinkers and eaters.
I'm off to make a cup of tea (while I'm still allowed to).
A lot of us already already are. Just ask Roy Castle. (on no, you can't, he died from passive smoking!)
No, Roy Castle (whom I greatly admired, by the way)claimed he contracted lung cancer through passive smoking. Thepresumed link between passive smoking and lung cancer is statistical. It can't be proven in any one case.